I could continue, but that should suffice, at least for now. What I find interesting is that the more bizarre the accusations against a criminal personality, the greater the hesitancy to believe it. It should be exactly the opposite when the person has a history of similar behavior. Obama's life is filled with criminal - and homosexual - behavior going all the way back to his days as a teenager in Hawaii. Do your homework, for example, on Frank Marshall Davis. I have and you should as well, instead of quickly jumping to the defense of the single greatest fraud to ever occupy the White House.
Are we really expected to believe all these negatives about Obama? Sure, I was aware of his links to Acorn and that he was a “student” of Saul Alinski, but he was a “male prostitute”?? Where is your evidence?
I opposed Obama in 2008 and 2012, just like any rational, astute voter, but . . .
I could continue, but that should suffice, at least for now. What I find interesting is that the more bizarre the accusations against a criminal personality, the greater the hesitancy to believe it. It should be exactly the opposite when the person has a history of similar behavior. Obama's life is filled with criminal - and homosexual - behavior going all the way back to his days as a teenager in Hawaii. Do your homework, for example, on Frank Marshall Davis. I have and you should as well, instead of quickly jumping to the defense of the single greatest fraud to ever occupy the White House.
You don't think Tucker Carlson did his due diligence before the following interview?
https://x.com/i/status/1745221829059576172
https://www.opindia.com/2023/09/larry-sinclair-gay-sex-cocaine-barack-obama-1999-tucker-carlson-interview/
Or, how about these as evidence...?
Ben Shapiro - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_r-e3iTSyY
https://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair-Cocaine/dp/0578013878
I could continue, but that should suffice, at least for now. What I find interesting is that the more bizarre the accusations against a criminal personality, the greater the hesitancy to believe it. It should be exactly the opposite when the person has a history of similar behavior. Obama's life is filled with criminal - and homosexual - behavior going all the way back to his days as a teenager in Hawaii. Do your homework, for example, on Frank Marshall Davis. I have and you should as well, instead of quickly jumping to the defense of the single greatest fraud to ever occupy the White House.
Are we really expected to believe all these negatives about Obama? Sure, I was aware of his links to Acorn and that he was a “student” of Saul Alinski, but he was a “male prostitute”?? Where is your evidence?
I opposed Obama in 2008 and 2012, just like any rational, astute voter, but . . .
You don't think Tucker Carlson did his due diligence before the following interview?
https://x.com/i/status/1745221829059576172
https://www.opindia.com/2023/09/larry-sinclair-gay-sex-cocaine-barack-obama-1999-tucker-carlson-interview/
Or, how about these as evidence...?
Ben Shapiro - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_r-e3iTSyY
https://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair-Cocaine/dp/0578013878
I could continue, but that should suffice, at least for now. What I find interesting is that the more bizarre the accusations against a criminal personality, the greater the hesitancy to believe it. It should be exactly the opposite when the person has a history of similar behavior. Obama's life is filled with criminal - and homosexual - behavior going all the way back to his days as a teenager in Hawaii. Do your homework, for example, on Frank Marshall Davis. I have and you should as well, instead of quickly jumping to the defense of the single greatest fraud to ever occupy the White House.